Greenvelope vs. Paperless Post: Cost (2026)
Some links on this page are affiliate links; if you buy through one, we may earn a commission. That relationship never decides which companies we cover or what we conclude about them - see our review methodology.

Greenvelope for a flat price you can read on the company's own site before you commit, Paperless Post for per-design flexibility and a named-designer collection whose prices you will have to check yourself: that is the short version, and the asymmetry in that sentence is the whole story.
Greenvelope publishes its guest-tier pricing and dates it.
Every Paperless Post figure on this page reached me through Greenvelope's own comparison page about its rival, never through paperlesspost.com.
Both platforms are digital-only, so this is the choice you make before printing enters the conversation at all. Checked 2026-09-01.
What We Compared, and What We Did Not Test
Four things, each of which can change what you pay or whether the invitation gets seen: the shape of each pricing model and what the same 100-guest send costs under both, delivery channels and RSVP handling, design and customization range including the Rifle Paper Co. collection, and how each fits a formal wedding.
What I did not do: send a live test invitation on either platform, audit real guest deliverability or spam filtering, or price postage. Neither company sells a printed product, so there is no postage or print-cost line here to compare.
One asymmetry, before any of it. Greenvelope's pricing comes from Greenvelope, dated and consistent across two of its own pages.
Every Paperless Post price below reaches me through Greenvelope's published comparison page about its rival, which is a source with an obvious interest in how that rival's prices look, and none of it is confirmed on Paperless Post's own site.
This site earns commission on some outbound links. That relationship played no part in which two platforms this page compares, the order they appear in, or what it concludes about either of them.
Our review methodology page covers how entities get picked, what stays untested, and how this site is paid. Still sorting seller types rather than platforms? The layer above this page, how invitation companies actually differ, does that first.
Greenvelope vs. Paperless Post at a Glance
Read the Sourcing column first, then the row.
It is the only part of the table that tells you how much weight a cell can carry, and three kinds of evidence sit in here that a tidier table would render as equals: figures Greenvelope publishes about itself, figures that exist here only because Greenvelope published them about Paperless Post, and cells where this research found nothing at all.
A blank is not a bad result. It is a check nobody has run yet, and on this page the blanks fall on Paperless Post far more often than on Greenvelope.
| Attribute | Greenvelope | Paperless Post | Sourcing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pricing model shape | Flat one-time price by guest-count tier; no subscription and no per-guest fee, by its own account | Coin-based, paid per send, with a free tier for non-premium designs | Greenvelope: its own site. Paperless Post: Greenvelope's comparison page only |
| Entry price or free tier | $19 for up to 20 guests; no free tier recorded | Free for non-premium designs sent to up to 50 recipients | Greenvelope's own pricing page; the free-tier figure via Greenvelope's comparison page |
| Price at a 100-guest send | $99 flat, covering up to 100 guests, stated as of August 2026 | About $140, roughly 1,000 coins, for a fully customized card to 100 guests in a July 2026 worked example; premium designs quoted at roughly $0.60-$1.15 per guest | Greenvelope: official, dated, self-published. Paperless Post: competitor-published, not confirmed on paperlesspost.com |
| Delivery channels and RSVP handling | Email, text message and a shareable link, all feeding one RSVP dashboard | Not established in this research beyond general digital delivery | Greenvelope's own site; for Paperless Post, nothing found either way |
| Design and customization highlight | Optional custom background music on an invitation; states its designs come from human artists with no AI involved | A 200-design collaboration with Rifle Paper Co. | Greenvelope's own claims about itself; the collaboration via media coverage, not paperlesspost.com |
| Named-designer collection pricing | None documented | Print cards from $130 for 50 with lined envelopes; e-cards from $0.25 each | Media coverage of the collaboration |
| Reputation signals | 4.9 out of 5 across 10,344 Trustpilot reviews, as quoted by Greenvelope itself on a July 2026 page; plus a WeddingWire listing in Seattle, WA carrying 213 reviews | No independent review-aggregator rating found in this research | Greenvelope's own page citing Trustpilot, plus an aggregator listing. For Paperless Post, an absence rather than a low score |
| SMS limit and the subscription question | Greenvelope's own claim: 1,000 texts a month, no subscription. A third-party account describes a 500-message cap under a subscription model. Unresolved | Not applicable; no SMS claim captured for this platform | Greenvelope's own site against an unnamed third-party account; neither checked against the other |
| Business-register check | Not performed; no formal register check exists for this category | Not performed; the same category-wide gap | This research |
Paperless Post vs. Greenvelope: Which Is Actually Cheaper at the Same Guest Count?
Take 100 guests, since that is where most couples writing to me land.
Greenvelope's answer is $99. That tier covers up to 100 guests, it is charged once, and the company states it as of August 2026 on its own pricing pages, where the figure holds steady across two of them. Greenvelope also says nothing recurring sits underneath it: no subscription, no fee per guest.
Paperless Post's answer is harder to give you honestly.
The single worked example this research turned up puts a fully customized card sent to 100 guests at roughly 1,000 coins, about $140, in a July 2026 example published by Greenvelope on its own comparison page about Paperless Post.
That is one company pricing its competitor. The same caveat rides on the premium rate quoted there, roughly $0.60 to $1.15 per guest. I could not confirm any of it on paperlesspost.com.
Eight years of reconciling vendor quotes left me with one reflex: open the company's own current page before believing anybody else's account of it. I could not finish that step here. So the $140 travels with its source attached every time it appears on this page, rather than being lined up against the $99 as though the two numbers were equally solid.
The free tier flips the arithmetic anyway. Paperless Post's non-premium designs are free to send to up to 50 recipients. Greenvelope's cheapest paid tier is $19 for up to 20 guests, and its file records no free option at all.
Picture a 40-guest courthouse wedding sending a non-premium design: nothing on one platform, $99 on the other, because 40 guests overshoots Greenvelope's 20-guest tier and lands in the next one up.
There is no fixed cheaper here. Guest count and design choice decide it together, and either one can reverse the answer.
The Rifle Paper Co. collection is priced apart from all of the above. Print cards start at $130 for 50 with lined envelopes, e-cards at $0.25 each, according to media coverage of the partnership rather than Paperless Post's own site. Do not read the coin estimate as covering it.
Where Greenvelope and Paperless Post Actually Differ
Three places, and only one of them is about money.
Delivery Channels and RSVP Handling
Greenvelope sends by email and text message, plus a shareable link, and every route feeds one RSVP dashboard. The text channel is where its claims stop agreeing with each other. Greenvelope's own position is 1,000 messages a month, no subscription attached; a third-party account describes a 500-message limit under a subscription model instead.
I am not picking between them, because nothing in this research resolves it: one is the company describing itself, the other an outside description I could not trace to a named source. Confirm the texting allowance on Greenvelope's own page.
For Paperless Post, this research did not establish delivery channels or RSVP mechanics at all, past the fact that it delivers digitally. That is a gap in what I checked, not a finding that the features are missing.
A dashboard only helps if the invitations go out on time. When the invitations actually have to go out covers the timing side.
Design, Customization, and the Rifle Paper Co. Collaboration
Greenvelope lets you upload custom background music to play with an invitation, a feature it names on its own comparison page as one its rival lacks. Worth remembering who is describing whom. It also states its designs come from human artists with no AI involved, which is again Greenvelope's account of Greenvelope.
Paperless Post's design headline is a real named-designer partnership: a 200-design collection with Rifle Paper Co., documented in media coverage rather than on Paperless Post's own site. It is the one Paperless Post detail here that does not arrive through a competitor.
If the illustration style is what drew you, the same designer, sold through a digital collaboration covers what Rifle Paper Co. sells and where.
Formality and Deliverability Fit for a Traditional Wedding
This is the risk neither platform can engineer away, and it belongs to the format rather than to either company. Digital invitations can land in spam folders. They can also go unread by guests who do not check email often, which in practice means older relatives more than anyone else.
Both are documented for the category, and both apply to Greenvelope and Paperless Post identically.
Then the perception question, which no software solves. A guest who expects a mailed invitation for a traditional wedding may read an emailed one as less formal, whatever it looks like on screen. Every ranked page I read waves at that and calls digital "acceptable," which is not an answer.
My own read: if a meaningful slice of your list would take it as a slight, budget the phone calls, not a better template.
Where the Evidence Is Thin
The two platforms are not documented to the same standard, and the gaps are different in kind rather than in size.
Greenvelope quotes a 4.9 out of 5 average across 10,344 Trustpilot reviews on its own page, dated July 2026. Nobody in this research opened Trustpilot and read that score independently, so it stands here as a self-reported figure, which is what a company says its rating is. The volume behind it is genuinely large, and that is worth something on its own.
Separately, Greenvelope has a WeddingWire business listing in Seattle, WA carrying 213 reviews, and that listing anyone can go look at.
I over-ordered my own invitations by forty because I trusted a headline number instead of recounting households, so I have a standing distrust of any figure a party publishes about its own performance.
That is exactly the label on the 4.9.
Paperless Post has no independent review-aggregator rating captured anywhere in this research. Not a low one. None found at all.
Do not put those two side by side and call them comparable. A self-reported average is a real number with a conflict of interest attached. A missing rating is an unopened box.
Who Should Choose Greenvelope, and Who Should Choose Paperless Post
No winner here, and no score. The two fail differently, so the useful question is which weakness you are willing to carry.
Greenvelope suits a couple who wants one flat price known before any design decision gets made, at $19, $99 or $249 depending on guest count, and who is comfortable weighing a satisfaction signal that is large in volume but reported by the company about itself.
Its real limitation is the texting question.
Greenvelope's own 1,000-message, no-subscription claim sits against a third-party account of a 500-message cap under a subscription, and this page cannot tell you which one describes what you would actually buy.
If text delivery is central to how you plan to reach guests, confirm it directly first. Read the full Greenvelope review for the rest of the file.
Paperless Post suits a couple who wants per-design pricing flexibility, including a genuinely free path for a send of up to 50 recipients, or who specifically wants the Rifle Paper Co. collection and is buying the illustration rather than the platform.
Its real limitation on this page is evidentiary rather than commercial: not one pricing figure above came from Paperless Post itself, and no independent rating for it surfaced anywhere. Verify every number here on paperlesspost.com before you order, and treat what I have given you as a starting point for that check.
Read the full Paperless Post review for what the file does and does not contain.
Greenvelope vs. Paperless Post: Frequently Asked Questions
Does Greenvelope charge a subscription? Greenvelope says it does not. Its own pricing pages describe a one-time charge by guest tier with no subscription and no per-guest fee, and it puts texting at 1,000 messages a month on that same basis. A third-party account describes a 500-message cap under a subscription model instead.
Nothing here resolves the two, so read Greenvelope's current terms before counting on either version.
Is Greenvelope, or Paperless Post, appropriate for a formal, traditional wedding? Either can be, and neither guarantees it.
The formality question is about your guests rather than the platform: some relatives read any emailed invitation as less formal than a mailed one, and that reaction attaches to the digital format itself, not to which company you picked.
No design on either platform fixes it.
Will older or less tech-savvy guests actually see a digital invitation? Some will not, and that risk is documented for digital invitations generally. Messages can land in spam folders, and guests who rarely check email miss them outright. It applies to both platforms equally, since neither controls the filter on the other end.
Plan a phone call for the guests you are unsure about.
Does Paperless Post's Rifle Paper Co. collection cost the same as its regular coin pricing? No, it is priced separately. Print cards start at $130 for 50 cards with lined envelopes and e-cards at $0.25 each, according to media coverage of the partnership rather than Paperless Post's own site. The roughly 1,000-coin estimate used elsewhere on this page covers a general customized send, not this collection.
Can I try a design for free before paying anything? On Paperless Post, yes, within limits: its non-premium designs are free to send to up to 50 recipients, per the same competitor-published comparison page every Paperless Post figure here comes from. Greenvelope's file records no free tier, only paid guest-count tiers starting at $19 for up to 20 guests. Confirm the free option on paperlesspost.com first.
Other Invitation Options Worth Comparing
- Read the full Greenvelope review and read the full Paperless Post review for the two files behind this page.
- The same designer, sold through a digital collaboration if the Rifle Paper Co. collection is what brought you here.
- When the invitations actually have to go out for the timing your RSVP dashboard depends on.
- How invitation companies actually differ for the layer above this comparison.
Before you send anything, open Greenvelope's own current pricing page and then Paperless Post's own site, since no Paperless Post figure here was confirmed there. Price your real guest count against the design you actually want, in that order. Brand recognition is not a price.
External links open in a new tab.